A concurrent resolution authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in state of the remains of the late James Earl Carter, Jr., 39th President of the United States.

While there is no explicit statement about this specific bill in the public record, the bill is a ceremonial concurrent resolution honoring former President Jimmy Carter's lying in state—a non-partisan matter of national respect and remembrance. Senator Whitehouse, as a Democratic senator, would almost certainly support such a resolution. These types of ceremonial honors for former presidents traditionally receive unanimous or near-unanimous support across party lines in Congress. The absence of any controversial policy content, combined with the ceremonial nature of the bill and Whitehouse's profile as a mainstream Democratic senator, makes strong support the most reasonable inference, though without an explicit statement, confidence cannot be higher.

The bill is a ceremonial resolution honoring former President Jimmy Carter's lying in state. While the public record does not contain explicit statements about this specific bill, several factors suggest likely support: (1) Senator Murray is a Democrat, and such ceremonial honors for former presidents typically receive bipartisan support; (2) Jimmy Carter was a Democratic president who served with distinction and maintained high approval ratings; (3) There is no evidence of any controversial positions that would prompt opposition to a ceremonial honor. However, confidence is not higher due to the complete absence of direct evidence about Murray's position on this specific bill in the provided materials. The stance is marked as 'possible_support' rather than 'strong_support' because ceremonial resolutions, while typically uncontroversial, rarely generate explicit statements from senators' public websites.

No explicit statement about this specific bill was found in the public record. However, several factors suggest likely support: (1) Mike Rounds is a Republican U.S. Senator, and honoring former presidents with lying in state ceremonies typically receives bipartisan support; (2) Jimmy Carter was a former U.S. President, and such ceremonial honors are generally non-partisan matters that receive near-universal Congressional support; (3) The bill is a concurrent resolution for a formal state funeral ceremony, not a controversial policy matter. The lower confidence reflects the absence of direct evidence from Rounds' official positions, but the nature of the bill makes strong support highly probable based on typical Congressional behavior on such ceremonial matters.

The public record contains no explicit statements or indicators regarding Mike Lee's position on this specific concurrent resolution honoring former President Jimmy Carter's lying in state. The content focuses on Lee's legislative priorities (government spending, DEI, small business regulation, etc.), which are unrelated to this ceremonial resolution. Lying in state resolutions are typically non-partisan and procedural honors for deceased presidents, and such votes rarely generate controversy or opposition from senators regardless of party. While Lee is a Republican and Carter was a Democrat, there is no information suggesting Lee would oppose this ceremonial honor. However, without explicit evidence of support or past voting patterns on similar resolutions, a confident stance cannot be determined.

The public record does not contain any explicit statements, voting records, or policy positions related to this specific bill about James Earl Carter Jr.'s lying in state ceremony. The content shows Merkley's recent work on wildfire resilience, airport funding, forest service budgeting, financial regulation, and criticism of Trump administration policies—none of which directly address this ceremonial resolution. While Merkley is a Democratic senator who would likely support honoring a former Democratic president as a matter of bipartisan respect and tradition, there is insufficient specific evidence in the provided material to determine his actual stance on this particular bill. Such ceremonial resolutions typically receive broad bipartisan support, but without explicit confirmation, a neutral classification is most appropriate.

No explicit statements about this specific bill are found in the provided website content. The public record shows Moreno's recent legislative priorities (prediction markets ban, Chinese vehicle restrictions, immigration enforcement) but contains no information about his position on the Carter lying in state resolution. This is a ceremonial bill honoring a former president that typically receives bipartisan or unanimous support, suggesting likely support based on norm, but without explicit evidence of Moreno's stance or relevant policy positions that directly apply to this non-partisan ceremonial matter, confidence must remain low.

The public record does not contain any explicit statements, press releases, or legislative records regarding this specific bill about James Earl Carter Jr.'s lying in state. The content appears to be generic website navigation and office information. While this is a ceremonial resolution honoring a former U.S. President and fellow Georgian (Carter was from Georgia), which would typically receive bipartisan support, there is insufficient evidence from the provided material to determine Ossoff's specific stance on this bill. To make a confident assessment, voting records, press statements, or direct comments about this resolution would be needed.

The public record contains no explicit statements about this specific bill authorizing the use of the Capitol rotunda for President Jimmy Carter's lying in state. The content shows Paul's legislative priorities (Federal Reserve audits, regulatory reform, hemp safety, vaccine policy, student loan relief, and government efficiency) which do not directly relate to this ceremonial resolution. While concurrent resolutions honoring deceased presidents are typically bipartisan and non-controversial measures that most members support, Paul's libertarian-leaning skepticism of government spending and ceremony could theoretically influence his position. However, without explicit evidence of his stance on this specific bill or similar ceremonial measures, a neutral classification with low-to-moderate confidence is most appropriate. His party affiliation (Republican) and typical voting patterns on routine Senate business suggest likely support, but this remains speculative without direct evidence.

The public record contains only general constituent services information, office locations, and recent press releases unrelated to this bill. There are no explicit statements about Rick Scott's position on the Carter lying in state resolution. While concurrent resolutions authorizing Capitol rotunda ceremonies are typically passed with broad bipartisan support as ceremonial honors, without specific evidence of Scott's stance on this particular bill or similar resolutions, a neutral classification with low confidence is appropriate. The lack of any relevant content makes a definitive determination impossible based on the provided information.

The public record provided is largely a navigation menu and does not contain any explicit statements about this specific bill or about presidential honors/lying in state ceremonies. While Tuberville is a conservative Republican senator, this particular bill is a ceremonial honor for former President Jimmy Carter (a Democrat) that typically receives bipartisan support. Without access to his actual voting record on this specific bill, his public statements about it, or relevant policy positions that would directly apply, a confident determination cannot be made. Ceremonial resolutions honoring deceased presidents generally receive near-unanimous support regardless of party affiliation, which would suggest possible support, but this cannot be confirmed from the available information.

The public record does not contain any explicit statements regarding this specific bill about President Carter's lying in state. The content shows Todd Young is a U.S. Senator (not Representative) from Indiana with focus areas including veterans issues, national security, and various legislative priorities, but nothing related to this ceremonial resolution. Without explicit evidence of his position, past voting on similar ceremonial resolutions, or relevant policy statements, a definitive stance cannot be determined. However, such bipartisan ceremonial honors for former presidents typically receive broad support across party lines, which would suggest likely support, but this cannot be confirmed from available information.